An argument in favor of gun ownership through studying history

The pros and cons of gun control come to the forefront of debate in the wake of mass shootings that continue to pop up throughout the nation.

An argument in favor of gun ownership through studying history

This list is not intended to incite controversy, but to foster an even-sided debate. The issue of gun control is global, but since it is most controversial in the United States of America, that nation is referred to most in the following entries.

This was in response to the Dunblane Massacre, in which year-old Thomas Hamilton walked into an elementary school and shot dead 16 children, aged six or younger, and one teacher before killing himself.

He used four handguns. Now that modern handguns are no longer legal to have in the UK, let us take a look at some murder rates.

The rate for intentional homicide in the UK in —the year of the Dunblane Massacre—was 1. The rate rose to a peak of 2. These numbers have, however, been called into question due to possible under-reporting of violent crimes in the UK.

The ownership of a firearm should not be illegal when most gun owners are law-abiding citizens who use guns in a responsible manner. Our country’s founding fathers ratified the second amendment as a part of our Constitution in order to protect citizen’s right to bear arms and to be prepared for. Oct 07,  · Federal law requires that licensed gun dealers conduct a background check, through a database run by the F.B.I., to see if the customer is among those prohibited from owning a gun. Start studying Gun Control. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Search. alternative explanation for gun ownership, gun ownership result of racial prejudice or punitiveness. criminals cant be disarmed or prevented through gun gun b/c they will always be willing to evade and commit crimes w/o.

It cannot be denied that the rate of homicides via guns has fallen dramatically since Dunblane, but the rate of murders has gone up. To say these higher numbers are the result of fewer people able to arm themselves for defense is drastically jumping to a conclusion, but the fact does remain that more people are killing each other in the UK today than when guns were legal to have.

Even the police are almost all armed with tasers instead, so handguns are very hard to come by. All the numbers are higher in the US, of course, where there are more people, and there have been no more school shootings in the UK since Dunblane.

But inthere were intentional murders in the UK and most of these were committed with knives. Blunt objects follow, then strangulation, fire, and poison. Banning guns has halted rampage shootings, but it does not address the issue of people killing each other.

In the US, the number of intentional homicides in was 10,—a number that would have been much lower without access to guns, but still terribly high. Opponents of gun control are always quick to question how many victims of knives, clubs, and strangulation would be alive if they had had a gun.

Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.

Secretary of State; previously Democratic Senator (NY)

It was probably written by someone on the Internet, who then tacked his name onto it. Proponents cite the only obvious use for an assault rifle—killing people—and defend ammunition limitations as a compromise that will save lives. Opponents maintain that a single life lost due to some maniac with a gun is just as excessive as The issue of fully automatic firearms has been a hotbed for a long time.

In some states, they are legal for civilians, provided that an extra fee is paid. This is because that state considers any limitation of guns to be unconstitutional.

California does not agree. In that state, no semiautomatic firearm may contain more than 10 rounds at any time. Assault rifles are completely banned. There are some federal limits: Proponents of gun control claim this should entail proper training.

Opponents claim that almost all gun owners train themselves in their free time. They further claim that, should any affront be made to the Second Amendment, those who want to control guns will no longer have any line to cross.

They will interpret as they see fit any word or phrase of any Amendment in order to limit more and more rights until, in this case, all guns are banned from civilian use.

The weapon reloads each round on its own—all you have to do is pull the trigger again and again.

An argument in favor of gun ownership through studying history

It is true that these weapons were invented for the purpose of warfare, not hunting, though they can be used for either.Reducing the issue of gun control to "pros" and "cons" is probably the least desirable outcome of studying gun control, but it may be a very useful beginning.

The pure pleasure of argument will attract some students.

Pro gun control argument essay writing

History of gun legislation (e.g., Jim Crow, s, post-Kennedy and King assassinations) Constitutional protections for. The Case for More Guns (and More Gun Control) America’s level of gun ownership means that even if the Supreme Court—which ruled in that the Second Amendment gives citizens the.

10 Arguments For and Against Gun Control For decades, gun control had been a secondary issue in presidential elections. But in the wake of an increasing number of mass, public shootings, presidential hopefuls are experiencing a dramatic shift, and candidates are being forced to talk more on gun control, which promises to become a far more.

An argument in favor of gun ownership through studying history

Argument 4: Is prohibiting gun ownership compatible with the 2nd Amendment? that more Americans supported the concept of gun rights than gun control. buys a gun go through a background. Balance lawful gun ownership & keeping guns from criminals Q: Both you and Sen. Obama, in the past, have supported strong gun control measures.

It’s correct that Seung-hui Cho had a court-documented history of mental illness that should have precluded his purchase of a firearm.

Her position on gun control puts her at odds with the. An Argument Against Gun Control Hundreds of law-abiding citizens were able to take up arms against lawless guns are used to aid in violence and many would argue that eliminating guns through stricter laws would decrease violence.

As the number of gun owners in the world increases the government and its citizens would benefit from.

Guns in America: Facts, figures, and an up-close look at the gun control debate | Hub