Assessing for deep knowledge.
The comparison is inapt, for the following four reasons. First, there is the obvious difference in the tactics used by the defenders of the old order. Blacks and their white supporters who demonstrated against segregation were often beaten, hosed down, and attacked by police dogs.
None of this has been done to the contemporary proponents of further expanded anti-discrimination laws. Second, there is the obvious difference in the tactics used by the proponents of the proposed new order.
Those involved in the civil rights movement of the s and s were, as is well known, scrupulously non-violent. In addition to that, however, they were also careful not to hurl hatred or anger of any kind at those on the other side. They probably did this in part because they were sincere Christians who earnestly wanted to follow Jesus in loving their enemies.
This was the explicit teaching of Reverend King, and since the civil rights movement he led was overwhelmingly Christian, his followers listened to him. Recall that his organization was the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. In contrast, the proponents of the new, expanded order of non-discrimination have promiscuously hurled anger and hatred at their opponents.
The examples are too depressing to cite and too numerous to require citation. Third, there is an obvious difference in the political lay of the land. We can see this by thinking further about why the old civil rights movement was so polite and loving, and why the people who today claim to be their successors are not.
The followers of Reverend King were sincere Christians and so committed to loving engagement with their opponents, as I have said. But there was probably also an element of political prudence in their conduct.
They knew they were part of a small and unpopular minority in the country, and so they knew they could only harm their cause by resorting to abusive language. These are all important differences, but they mainly have to do with tactics and the political environment.
There is in fact an important substantive difference that should be noted. Fourth, the kinds of discrimination about which the left is now complaining are not at all analogous to what was practiced in the s and s.
I mean that the motivation is clearly not the same.
The motivation in the past was raw racial animus. The motivation here is clearly religious or moral conscience. I would ask those insisting on the analogy to scour the records of racially segregationist America and see if they can find an example of a racist business owner who said: Because the segregationists of the s and s were animated by racial animus.
They wanted to keep blacks away from them and in an inferior position, period. This is clearly not what conservative Christians are attempting who do not want to be conscripted by law into serving at gay wedding ceremonies.
They make a distinction the old time racists would never make. The views expressed here are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of CatholicVote.Music in the Civil Rights Movement African American spirituals, gospel, and folk music all played an important role in the Civil Rights Movement.
Singers and musicians collaborated with ethnomusicologists and song collectors to disseminate songs to activists, both at large meetings and through publications. Civil Rights act is known as a most comprehensive document that defend civil rights regardless the race of citizen.
Originally it was created by John F. Kennedy however due to massive resistance; the acceptance of this bill got delayed. After all, the bill passed with results 73 to 27 in June This act was a great victory for activists of the movement. In the same time it was considered as an enormous . Nov 21, · As a result, the Civil Rights movement was born.
John will talk about the early careers of Martin Luther King, Thurgood Marshall, Rosa Parks, and even Earl Warren. In the ugly controversy over Indiana’s RFRA law, we have once again heard some proponents of gay rights present their movement as an heir to the civil rights movement of the s and s–and also poisonously comparing their political opponents to the racists and segregationists of that time.
Martin luther king jr contribution civil rights movement Indeed, online edition of segregation billy graham, specialty books, bargaining agreements, also named after king jr. Research done by henry david thoreau opens leader dr.
Enjoy proficient essay, jr: martin luther king, specialty books and focus for grades k, and the u. The civil rights movement was a mass popular movement to secure for African Americans equal access to and opportunities for the basic privileges and rights of U.S. citizenship. Although the roots of the movement go back to the 19th century, it peaked in the s and s.